Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Core i9 13900HK
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Core i9 13900HK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 115 | 111 | +3.6% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,855 | 1,009 | +83.8% |
| Cores | 16 | 14 (6P+8E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 45 | 35 | — |
- Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is faster than Core i9 13900HK by 3.6% in single-core and faster by 83.8% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Core i9 13900HK draws less power (35W vs 45W base TDP).
Verdict: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 or Core i9 13900HK?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 advantages
- Multi-core speed (+46%)
Core i9 13900HK advantages
- Power efficiency (+22%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
- Choose the Core i9 13900HK if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Core i9 13900HK: which should you choose?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — 16-core AMD processor scoring 115 single-core and 1855 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 45 W TDP and 64 MB L3 cache.
Core i9 13900HK — 14-core Intel processor (6P+8E) scoring 111 single-core and 1009 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 35 W TDP.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Core i9 13900HK: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 leads in multi-core performance. Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is faster than Core i9 13900HK by 3.6% in single-core and faster by 83.8% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core i9 13900HK draws less power (35W vs 45W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 leads there with a single-core score of 115 versus 111, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is stronger, posting 1,855 multi-core against 1,009 in Cinebench 2024. Its 16 cores give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Core i9 13900HK is the more efficient chip at 35 W versus 45 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 better than the Core i9 13900HK?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 takes the overall edge, though Core i9 13900HK wins in specific areas worth weighing. Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is faster than Core i9 13900HK by 3.6% in single-core and faster by 83.8% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and the Core i9 13900HK?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is faster than Core i9 13900HK by 3.6% in single-core and faster by 83.8% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core i9 13900HK draws less power (35W vs 45W base TDP).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking. Choose the Core i9 13900HK if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.