Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Core i9 13905H
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Core i9 13905H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 125 | 119 | +5.0% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,242 | 1,098 | +13.1% |
| Cores | 12 (4P+8E) | 14 (6P+8E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 15 | 35 | — |
- Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is faster than Core i9 13905H by 5.0% in single-core and faster by 13.1% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 draws less power (15W vs 35W base TDP).
Verdict: Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 or Core i9 13905H?
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 advantages
- Single-core speed (+5%)
- Multi-core speed (+12%)
- Power efficiency (+57%)
Core i9 13905H advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
- Choose the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Core i9 13905H: which should you choose?
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 — 12-core AMD processor (4P+8E) scoring 125 single-core and 1242 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 15 W TDP and 16 MB L3 cache.
Core i9 13905H — 14-core Intel processor (6P+8E) scoring 119 single-core and 1098 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 35 W TDP.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Core i9 13905H: Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 leads in multi-core performance. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is faster than Core i9 13905H by 5.0% in single-core and faster by 13.1% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 draws less power (15W vs 35W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 leads there with a single-core score of 125 versus 119, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is stronger, posting 1,242 multi-core against 1,098 in Cinebench 2024. Its 12 cores (4 performance + 8 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the more efficient chip at 15 W versus 35 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 better than the Core i9 13905H?
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is faster than Core i9 13905H by 5.0% in single-core and faster by 13.1% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and the Core i9 13905H?
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is faster than Core i9 13905H by 5.0% in single-core and faster by 13.1% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 draws less power (15W vs 35W base TDP).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness. Choose the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.