Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Core Ultra 7 155H
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 7 155H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 117 | 99 | +18.2% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,077 | 957 | +12.5% |
| Cores | 10 (4P+6E) | 16 (6P+10E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 15 | 20 | — |
- Ryzen AI 9 365 is faster than Core Ultra 7 155H by 18.2% in single-core and faster by 12.5% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Ryzen AI 9 365 draws less power (15W vs 20W base TDP).
Verdict: Ryzen AI 9 365 or Core Ultra 7 155H?
Ryzen AI 9 365 advantages
- Single-core speed (+15%)
- Multi-core speed (+11%)
- Power efficiency (+25%)
Core Ultra 7 155H advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Ryzen AI 9 365 if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
- Choose the Ryzen AI 9 365 if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Core Ultra 7 155H: which should you choose?
Ryzen AI 9 365 — 10-core AMD processor (4P+6E) scoring 117 single-core and 1077 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 15 W TDP.
Core Ultra 7 155H — 16-core Intel processor (6P+10E) scoring 99 single-core and 957 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 20 W TDP.
Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Core Ultra 7 155H: Ryzen AI 9 365 leads in multi-core performance. Ryzen AI 9 365 is faster than Core Ultra 7 155H by 18.2% in single-core and faster by 12.5% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Ryzen AI 9 365 draws less power (15W vs 20W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Ryzen AI 9 365 leads there with a single-core score of 117 versus 99, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Ryzen AI 9 365 is stronger, posting 1,077 multi-core against 957 in Cinebench 2024. Its 10 cores (4 performance + 6 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Ryzen AI 9 365 is the more efficient chip at 15 W versus 20 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ryzen AI 9 365 better than the Core Ultra 7 155H?
Ryzen AI 9 365 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Ryzen AI 9 365 is faster than Core Ultra 7 155H by 18.2% in single-core and faster by 12.5% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Ryzen AI 9 365 and the Core Ultra 7 155H?
Ryzen AI 9 365 is faster than Core Ultra 7 155H by 18.2% in single-core and faster by 12.5% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Ryzen AI 9 365 draws less power (15W vs 20W base TDP).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Ryzen AI 9 365 if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness. Choose the Ryzen AI 9 365 if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.