Core Ultra 7 270K Plus vs M4 Max
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Core Ultra 7 270K Plus | M4 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 145 | 187 | -22.5% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 2,482 | 2,044 | +21.4% |
| Cores | 24 (8P+16E) | 16 (12P+4E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 125 | 70 | — |
- Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is slower than M4 Max by 22.5% in single-core and faster by 21.4% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- M4 Max draws less power (70W vs 125W base TDP).
Verdict: Core Ultra 7 270K Plus or M4 Max?
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus advantages
- Multi-core speed (+18%)
M4 Max advantages
- Single-core speed (+22%)
- Power efficiency (+44%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
- Choose the M4 Max if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus vs M4 Max: which should you choose?
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus — 24-core Intel processor (8P+16E) scoring 145 single-core and 2482 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 125 W TDP and 36 MB L3 cache.
M4 Max — 16-core Apple processor (12P+4E) scoring 187 single-core and 2044 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 70 W TDP.
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus vs M4 Max: Core Ultra 7 270K Plus leads in multi-core performance. Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is slower than M4 Max by 22.5% in single-core and faster by 21.4% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). M4 Max draws less power (70W vs 125W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The M4 Max leads there with a single-core score of 187 versus 145, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is stronger, posting 2,482 multi-core against 2,044 in Cinebench 2024. Its 24 cores (8 performance + 16 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The M4 Max is the more efficient chip at 70 W versus 125 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus better than the M4 Max?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is slower than M4 Max by 22.5% in single-core and faster by 21.4% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and the M4 Max?
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is slower than M4 Max by 22.5% in single-core and faster by 21.4% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). M4 Max draws less power (70W vs 125W base TDP).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking. Choose the M4 Max if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.