Core Ultra 7 265HX vs Core Ultra X7 358H
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Core Ultra X7 358H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 125 | 124 | +0.8% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,598 | 1,001 | +59.6% |
| Cores | 20 (8P+12E) | 16 (4P+12E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 45 | 15 | — |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 48,166 | 33,967 | +41.8% |
- Core Ultra 7 265HX is faster than Core Ultra X7 358H by 0.8% in single-core and faster by 59.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Core Ultra X7 358H draws less power (15W vs 45W base TDP).
Verdict: Core Ultra 7 265HX or Core Ultra X7 358H?
Core Ultra 7 265HX advantages
- Multi-core speed (+37%)
Core Ultra X7 358H advantages
- Power efficiency (+67%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Core Ultra 7 265HX if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
- Choose the Core Ultra X7 358H if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
Core Ultra 7 265HX vs Core Ultra X7 358H: which should you choose?
Core Ultra 7 265HX — 20-core Intel processor (8P+12E) scoring 125 single-core and 1598 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 45 W TDP.
Core Ultra X7 358H — 16-core Intel processor (4P+12E) scoring 124 single-core and 1001 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 15 W TDP and 18 MB L3 cache.
Core Ultra 7 265HX vs Core Ultra X7 358H: Core Ultra 7 265HX leads in multi-core performance. Core Ultra 7 265HX is faster than Core Ultra X7 358H by 0.8% in single-core and faster by 59.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core Ultra X7 358H draws less power (15W vs 45W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Core Ultra 7 265HX leads there with a single-core score of 125 versus 124, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Core Ultra 7 265HX is stronger, posting 1,598 multi-core against 1,001 in Cinebench 2024. Its 20 cores (8 performance + 12 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Core Ultra X7 358H is the more efficient chip at 15 W versus 45 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core Ultra 7 265HX better than the Core Ultra X7 358H?
Core Ultra 7 265HX takes the overall edge, though Core Ultra X7 358H wins in specific areas worth weighing. Core Ultra 7 265HX is faster than Core Ultra X7 358H by 0.8% in single-core and faster by 59.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Core Ultra 7 265HX and the Core Ultra X7 358H?
Core Ultra 7 265HX is faster than Core Ultra X7 358H by 0.8% in single-core and faster by 59.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core Ultra X7 358H draws less power (15W vs 45W base TDP).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Core Ultra 7 265HX if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking. Choose the Core Ultra X7 358H if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.