Core Ultra 7 155H vs Core Ultra 7 265K
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Core Ultra 7 155H | Core Ultra 7 265K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 99 | 138 | -28.3% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 957 | 2,017 | -52.6% |
| Cores | 16 (6P+10E) | 20 (8P+12E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 20 | 125 | — |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 24,539 | 58,603 | -58.1% |
| Street price (USD) | $503 | $284 | +77.1% |
- Core Ultra 7 155H is slower than Core Ultra 7 265K by 28.3% in single-core and slower by 52.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Core Ultra 7 155H draws less power (20W vs 125W base TDP).
Verdict: Core Ultra 7 155H or Core Ultra 7 265K?
Core Ultra 7 155H advantages
- Power efficiency (+84%)
Core Ultra 7 265K advantages
- Single-core speed (+28%)
- Multi-core speed (+53%)
- Affordability (+44%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Core Ultra 7 155H if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
- Choose the Core Ultra 7 265K if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Value for money
Core Ultra 7 265K delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Core Ultra 7 265K: which should you choose?
Core Ultra 7 155H — 16-core Intel processor (6P+10E) scoring 99 single-core and 957 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 20 W TDP.
Core Ultra 7 265K — 20-core Intel processor (8P+12E) scoring 138 single-core and 2017 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 125 W TDP and 30 MB L3 cache.
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Core Ultra 7 265K leads in multi-core performance. Core Ultra 7 155H is slower than Core Ultra 7 265K by 28.3% in single-core and slower by 52.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core Ultra 7 155H draws less power (20W vs 125W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Core Ultra 7 265K leads there with a single-core score of 138 versus 99, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Core Ultra 7 265K is stronger, posting 2,017 multi-core against 957 in Cinebench 2024. Its 20 cores (8 performance + 12 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Core Ultra 7 155H is the more efficient chip at 20 W versus 125 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core Ultra 7 155H better than the Core Ultra 7 265K?
Core Ultra 7 265K is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Core Ultra 7 155H is slower than Core Ultra 7 265K by 28.3% in single-core and slower by 52.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Core Ultra 7 155H and the Core Ultra 7 265K?
Core Ultra 7 155H is slower than Core Ultra 7 265K by 28.3% in single-core and slower by 52.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core Ultra 7 155H draws less power (20W vs 125W base TDP).
Which is better value?
Core Ultra 7 265K delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Core Ultra 7 155H if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build. Choose the Core Ultra 7 265K if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.