Core Ultra 5 235H vs M4 Pro
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Core Ultra 5 235H | M4 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 122 | 172 | -29.1% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 979 | 1,678 | -41.7% |
| Cores | 14 (4P+8E) | 14 (10P+4E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 20 | 46 | — |
- Core Ultra 5 235H is slower than M4 Pro by 29.1% in single-core and slower by 41.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Core Ultra 5 235H draws less power (20W vs 46W base TDP).
Verdict: Core Ultra 5 235H or M4 Pro?
Core Ultra 5 235H advantages
- Power efficiency (+57%)
M4 Pro advantages
- Single-core speed (+29%)
- Multi-core speed (+42%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Core Ultra 5 235H if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
- Choose the M4 Pro if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Core Ultra 5 235H vs M4 Pro: which should you choose?
Core Ultra 5 235H — 14-core Intel processor (4P+8E) scoring 122 single-core and 979 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 20 W TDP.
M4 Pro — 14-core Apple processor (10P+4E) scoring 172 single-core and 1678 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 46 W TDP.
Core Ultra 5 235H vs M4 Pro: M4 Pro leads in multi-core performance. Core Ultra 5 235H is slower than M4 Pro by 29.1% in single-core and slower by 41.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core Ultra 5 235H draws less power (20W vs 46W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The M4 Pro leads there with a single-core score of 172 versus 122, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the M4 Pro is stronger, posting 1,678 multi-core against 979 in Cinebench 2024. Its 14 cores (10 performance + 4 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Core Ultra 5 235H is the more efficient chip at 20 W versus 46 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core Ultra 5 235H better than the M4 Pro?
M4 Pro is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Core Ultra 5 235H is slower than M4 Pro by 29.1% in single-core and slower by 41.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Core Ultra 5 235H and the M4 Pro?
Core Ultra 5 235H is slower than M4 Pro by 29.1% in single-core and slower by 41.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core Ultra 5 235H draws less power (20W vs 46W base TDP).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Core Ultra 5 235H if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build. Choose the M4 Pro if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.