Core i9 14900HX vs Core i9 13905H
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Core i9 14900HX | Core i9 13905H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 130 | 119 | +9.2% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,780 | 1,098 | +62.1% |
| Cores | 24 (8P+16E) | 14 (6P+8E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 45 | 35 | — |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 43,856 | 29,679 | +47.8% |
| Street price (USD) | $679 | $697 | -2.6% |
- Core i9 14900HX is faster than Core i9 13905H by 9.2% in single-core and faster by 62.1% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Core i9 13905H draws less power (35W vs 45W base TDP).
Verdict: Core i9 14900HX or Core i9 13905H?
Core i9 14900HX advantages
- Single-core speed (+8%)
- Multi-core speed (+38%)
Core i9 13905H advantages
- Power efficiency (+22%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Core i9 14900HX if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
- Choose the Core i9 13905H if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
- Choose the Core i9 14900HX if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Value for money
Core i9 14900HX delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Core i9 14900HX vs Core i9 13905H: which should you choose?
Core i9 14900HX — 24-core Intel processor (8P+16E) scoring 130 single-core and 1780 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 45 W TDP.
Core i9 13905H — 14-core Intel processor (6P+8E) scoring 119 single-core and 1098 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 35 W TDP.
Core i9 14900HX vs Core i9 13905H: Core i9 14900HX leads in multi-core performance. Core i9 14900HX is faster than Core i9 13905H by 9.2% in single-core and faster by 62.1% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core i9 13905H draws less power (35W vs 45W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Core i9 14900HX leads there with a single-core score of 130 versus 119, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Core i9 14900HX is stronger, posting 1,780 multi-core against 1,098 in Cinebench 2024. Its 24 cores (8 performance + 16 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Core i9 13905H is the more efficient chip at 35 W versus 45 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core i9 14900HX better than the Core i9 13905H?
Core i9 14900HX is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Core i9 14900HX is faster than Core i9 13905H by 9.2% in single-core and faster by 62.1% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Core i9 14900HX and the Core i9 13905H?
Core i9 14900HX is faster than Core i9 13905H by 9.2% in single-core and faster by 62.1% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core i9 13905H draws less power (35W vs 45W base TDP).
Which is better value?
Core i9 14900HX delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Core i9 14900HX if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness. Choose the Core i9 13905H if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.