Core i9 13905H vs M4 Max
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Core i9 13905H | M4 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 119 | 187 | -36.4% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,098 | 2,044 | -46.3% |
| Cores | 14 (6P+8E) | 16 (12P+4E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 35 | 70 | — |
- Core i9 13905H is slower than M4 Max by 36.4% in single-core and slower by 46.3% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Core i9 13905H draws less power (35W vs 70W base TDP).
Verdict: Core i9 13905H or M4 Max?
Core i9 13905H advantages
- Power efficiency (+50%)
M4 Max advantages
- Single-core speed (+36%)
- Multi-core speed (+46%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Core i9 13905H if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
- Choose the M4 Max if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Core i9 13905H vs M4 Max: which should you choose?
Core i9 13905H — 14-core Intel processor (6P+8E) scoring 119 single-core and 1098 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 35 W TDP.
M4 Max — 16-core Apple processor (12P+4E) scoring 187 single-core and 2044 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 70 W TDP.
Core i9 13905H vs M4 Max: M4 Max leads in multi-core performance. Core i9 13905H is slower than M4 Max by 36.4% in single-core and slower by 46.3% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core i9 13905H draws less power (35W vs 70W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The M4 Max leads there with a single-core score of 187 versus 119, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the M4 Max is stronger, posting 2,044 multi-core against 1,098 in Cinebench 2024. Its 16 cores (12 performance + 4 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Core i9 13905H is the more efficient chip at 35 W versus 70 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core i9 13905H better than the M4 Max?
M4 Max is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Core i9 13905H is slower than M4 Max by 36.4% in single-core and slower by 46.3% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Core i9 13905H and the M4 Max?
Core i9 13905H is slower than M4 Max by 36.4% in single-core and slower by 46.3% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core i9 13905H draws less power (35W vs 70W base TDP).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Core i9 13905H if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build. Choose the M4 Max if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.