Core i9 13905H vs Core Ultra 9 185H
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Core i9 13905H | Core Ultra 9 185H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 119 | 107 | +11.2% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,098 | 987 | +11.2% |
| Cores | 14 (6P+8E) | 16 (6P+10E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 35 | 35 | — |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 29,679 | 29,045 | +2.2% |
- Core i9 13905H is faster than Core Ultra 9 185H by 11.2% in single-core and faster by 11.2% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
Verdict: Core i9 13905H or Core Ultra 9 185H?
Core i9 13905H advantages
- Single-core speed (+10%)
- Multi-core speed (+10%)
Core Ultra 9 185H advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Core i9 13905H if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
- Choose the Core i9 13905H if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Core i9 13905H vs Core Ultra 9 185H: which should you choose?
Core i9 13905H — 14-core Intel processor (6P+8E) scoring 119 single-core and 1098 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 35 W TDP.
Core Ultra 9 185H — 16-core Intel processor (6P+10E) scoring 107 single-core and 987 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 35 W TDP.
Core i9 13905H vs Core Ultra 9 185H: Core i9 13905H leads in multi-core performance. Core i9 13905H is faster than Core Ultra 9 185H by 11.2% in single-core and faster by 11.2% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Core i9 13905H leads there with a single-core score of 119 versus 107, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Core i9 13905H is stronger, posting 1,098 multi-core against 987 in Cinebench 2024. Its 14 cores (6 performance + 8 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Core i9 13905H is the more efficient chip at 35 W versus 35 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core i9 13905H better than the Core Ultra 9 185H?
Core i9 13905H is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Core i9 13905H is faster than Core Ultra 9 185H by 11.2% in single-core and faster by 11.2% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Core i9 13905H and the Core Ultra 9 185H?
Core i9 13905H is faster than Core Ultra 9 185H by 11.2% in single-core and faster by 11.2% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Core i9 13905H if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness. Choose the Core i9 13905H if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.