Core i9 13900HK vs Core Ultra 7 265KF
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Core i9 13900HK | Core Ultra 7 265KF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 111 | 138 | -19.6% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,009 | 2,067 | -51.2% |
| Cores | 14 (6P+8E) | 20 (8P+12E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 35 | 125 | — |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 26,761 | 58,531 | -54.3% |
| Street price (USD) | $697 | $292 | +138.7% |
- Core i9 13900HK is slower than Core Ultra 7 265KF by 19.6% in single-core and slower by 51.2% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Core i9 13900HK draws less power (35W vs 125W base TDP).
Verdict: Core i9 13900HK or Core Ultra 7 265KF?
Core i9 13900HK advantages
- Power efficiency (+72%)
Core Ultra 7 265KF advantages
- Single-core speed (+20%)
- Multi-core speed (+51%)
- Affordability (+58%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Core i9 13900HK if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
- Choose the Core Ultra 7 265KF if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Value for money
Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Core i9 13900HK vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: which should you choose?
Core i9 13900HK — 14-core Intel processor (6P+8E) scoring 111 single-core and 1009 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 35 W TDP.
Core Ultra 7 265KF — 20-core Intel processor (8P+12E) scoring 138 single-core and 2067 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 125 W TDP and 30 MB L3 cache.
Core i9 13900HK vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Core Ultra 7 265KF leads in multi-core performance. Core i9 13900HK is slower than Core Ultra 7 265KF by 19.6% in single-core and slower by 51.2% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core i9 13900HK draws less power (35W vs 125W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Core Ultra 7 265KF leads there with a single-core score of 138 versus 111, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Core Ultra 7 265KF is stronger, posting 2,067 multi-core against 1,009 in Cinebench 2024. Its 20 cores (8 performance + 12 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Core i9 13900HK is the more efficient chip at 35 W versus 125 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core i9 13900HK better than the Core Ultra 7 265KF?
Core Ultra 7 265KF is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Core i9 13900HK is slower than Core Ultra 7 265KF by 19.6% in single-core and slower by 51.2% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Core i9 13900HK and the Core Ultra 7 265KF?
Core i9 13900HK is slower than Core Ultra 7 265KF by 19.6% in single-core and slower by 51.2% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core i9 13900HK draws less power (35W vs 125W base TDP).
Which is better value?
Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Core i9 13900HK if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build. Choose the Core Ultra 7 265KF if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.