Core i9 12900HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Core i9 12900HX | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 112 | 115 | -2.6% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,269 | 1,855 | -31.6% |
| Cores | 16 (8P+8E) | 16 | — |
| TDP (base W) | 45 | 45 | — |
- Core i9 12900HX is slower than Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 2.6% in single-core and slower by 31.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
Verdict: Core i9 12900HX or Ryzen AI Max+ 395?
Core i9 12900HX advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 advantages
- Multi-core speed (+32%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Core i9 12900HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395: which should you choose?
Core i9 12900HX — 16-core Intel processor (8P+8E) scoring 112 single-core and 1269 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 45 W TDP.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — 16-core AMD processor scoring 115 single-core and 1855 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 45 W TDP and 64 MB L3 cache.
Core i9 12900HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 leads in multi-core performance. Core i9 12900HX is slower than Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 2.6% in single-core and slower by 31.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 leads there with a single-core score of 115 versus 112, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is stronger, posting 1,855 multi-core against 1,269 in Cinebench 2024. Its 16 cores give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Core i9 12900HX is the more efficient chip at 45 W versus 45 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core i9 12900HX better than the Ryzen AI Max+ 395?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Core i9 12900HX is slower than Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 2.6% in single-core and slower by 31.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Core i9 12900HX and the Ryzen AI Max+ 395?
Core i9 12900HX is slower than Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 2.6% in single-core and slower by 31.6% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.