Core i7 13800H vs Core Ultra 5 225H
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Core i7 13800H | Core Ultra 5 225H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 117 | 122 | -4.1% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,008 | 1,001 | +0.7% |
| Cores | 14 (6P+8E) | 14 (4P+8E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 35 | 20 | — |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 26,194 | 28,175 | -7.0% |
- Core i7 13800H is slower than Core Ultra 5 225H by 4.1% in single-core and faster by 0.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Core Ultra 5 225H draws less power (20W vs 35W base TDP).
Verdict: Core i7 13800H or Core Ultra 5 225H?
Core i7 13800H advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Core Ultra 5 225H advantages
- Single-core speed (+4%)
- Power efficiency (+43%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Core Ultra 5 225H if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Core i7 13800H vs Core Ultra 5 225H: which should you choose?
Core i7 13800H — 14-core Intel processor (6P+8E) scoring 117 single-core and 1008 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 35 W TDP.
Core Ultra 5 225H — 14-core Intel processor (4P+8E) scoring 122 single-core and 1001 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 20 W TDP.
Core i7 13800H vs Core Ultra 5 225H: Core i7 13800H leads in multi-core performance. Core i7 13800H is slower than Core Ultra 5 225H by 4.1% in single-core and faster by 0.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core Ultra 5 225H draws less power (20W vs 35W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Core Ultra 5 225H leads there with a single-core score of 122 versus 117, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Core i7 13800H is stronger, posting 1,008 multi-core against 1,001 in Cinebench 2024. Its 14 cores (6 performance + 8 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Core Ultra 5 225H is the more efficient chip at 20 W versus 35 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core i7 13800H better than the Core Ultra 5 225H?
Core Ultra 5 225H is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Core i7 13800H is slower than Core Ultra 5 225H by 4.1% in single-core and faster by 0.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Core i7 13800H and the Core Ultra 5 225H?
Core i7 13800H is slower than Core Ultra 5 225H by 4.1% in single-core and faster by 0.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core Ultra 5 225H draws less power (20W vs 35W base TDP).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Core Ultra 5 225H if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.