Core i7 13700F vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Core i7 13700F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 112 | 125 | -10.4% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,325 | 1,242 | +6.7% |
| Cores | 16 (8P+8E) | 12 (4P+8E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 65 | 15 | — |
| L3 cache (MB) | 30 | 16 | — |
- Core i7 13700F is slower than Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 by 10.4% in single-core and faster by 6.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 draws less power (15W vs 65W base TDP).
Verdict: Core i7 13700F or Ryzen AI 9 HX 370?
Core i7 13700F advantages
- Multi-core speed (+6%)
- Cache size (+47%)
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 advantages
- Single-core speed (+10%)
- Power efficiency (+77%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Core i7 13700F if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
- Choose the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
- Choose the Core i7 13700F if you play cache-sensitive games or run data-heavy workloads.
Core i7 13700F vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: which should you choose?
Core i7 13700F — 16-core Intel processor (8P+8E) scoring 112 single-core and 1325 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 65 W TDP and 30 MB L3 cache.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 — 12-core AMD processor (4P+8E) scoring 125 single-core and 1242 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 15 W TDP and 16 MB L3 cache.
Core i7 13700F vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Core i7 13700F leads in multi-core performance. Core i7 13700F is slower than Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 by 10.4% in single-core and faster by 6.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 draws less power (15W vs 65W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 leads there with a single-core score of 125 versus 112, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Core i7 13700F is stronger, posting 1,325 multi-core against 1,242 in Cinebench 2024. Its 16 cores (8 performance + 8 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the more efficient chip at 15 W versus 65 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core i7 13700F better than the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Core i7 13700F is slower than Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 by 10.4% in single-core and faster by 6.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Core i7 13700F and the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370?
Core i7 13700F is slower than Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 by 10.4% in single-core and faster by 6.7% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 draws less power (15W vs 65W base TDP).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Core i7 13700F if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking. Choose the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.