Apple M2 Max vs Intel Core i5-13400F
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Apple M2 Max | Intel Core i5-13400F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores / threads | 12 / 12 | 10 / 16 | — |
| Boost clock (GHz) | 3.7 | 4.6 | — |
| Single-core score | 2,700 | 2,500 | +8.0% |
| Multi-core score | 14,800 | 11,000 | +34.5% |
| TDP (W) | 40 | 65 | — |
- Apple M2 Max is faster than Intel Core i5-13400F by 8.0% in single-core and faster by 34.5% in multi-core.
- Apple M2 Max also draws less power (40W vs 65W).
Verdict: M2 Max or i5-13400F?
Apple M2 Max advantages
- Single-core speed (+7%)
- Multi-core speed (+26%)
- Power efficiency (+38%)
Intel Core i5-13400F advantages
- Peak clock (+20%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Apple M2 Max if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
- Choose the Intel Core i5-13400F if you want the highest peak clocks.
- Choose the Apple M2 Max if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Apple M2 Max vs Intel Core i5-13400F: which should you choose?
Apple M2 Max — 12-core / 12-thread Apple laptop processor (2023) with a boost clock of 3.7 GHz and 40 W TDP.
Intel Core i5-13400F — 10-core / 16-thread Intel desktop processor (2023) with a boost clock of 4.6 GHz and 65 W TDP.
Apple M2 Max vs Intel Core i5-13400F: Apple M2 Max leads in multi-core performance. Apple M2 Max is faster than Intel Core i5-13400F by 8.0% in single-core and faster by 34.5% in multi-core. Apple M2 Max also draws less power (40W vs 65W).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Apple M2 Max leads there with a single-core score of 2,700 versus 2,500, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Apple M2 Max is stronger, posting 14,800 multi-core against 11,000. Its 12 cores and 12 threads give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Apple M2 Max is the more efficient chip at 40 W versus 65 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Apple M2 Max better than the Intel Core i5-13400F?
Apple M2 Max is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Apple M2 Max is faster than Intel Core i5-13400F by 8.0% in single-core and faster by 34.5% in multi-core.
What is the main difference between the Apple M2 Max and the Intel Core i5-13400F?
Apple M2 Max is faster than Intel Core i5-13400F by 8.0% in single-core and faster by 34.5% in multi-core. Apple M2 Max also draws less power (40W vs 65W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Apple M2 Max if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness. Choose the Intel Core i5-13400F if you want the highest peak clocks.
Methodology
Each processor is scored on a normalized benchmark index aggregating single-core and multi-core results. Single-core predicts responsiveness and gaming; multi-core predicts throughput in rendering and compilation. We also report cores/threads, boost clock and TDP.