XPeng Mona M03 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | XPeng Mona M03 | Mercedes-Benz EQS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 218 | 360 | -39.4% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 280 | 568 | -50.7% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 11.5 | 15.1 | -23.8% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Single-speed | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $17,612 | $119,016 | -85.2% |
- Mercedes-Benz EQS makes about 39% more power (360 vs 218 hp).
- XPeng Mona M03 is the more efficient EV, using 11.5 kWh/100km against 15.1.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Mona M03 or EQS?
XPeng Mona M03 advantages
- Energy efficiency (+24%)
- Affordability (+85%)
Mercedes-Benz EQS advantages
- Engine power (+39%)
- Pulling torque (+51%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the XPeng Mona M03 if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQS if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the XPeng Mona M03 if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
XPeng Mona M03 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
XPeng Mona M03 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS: which should you choose?
XPeng Mona M03 (2026 Updated 620 Smart Edition) — electric sedan with 218 hp and 280 Nm, rated at 11.5 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $17,612 in the China market.
Mercedes-Benz EQS (2024 EQS 450+ Facelift) — electric sedan with 360 hp and 568 Nm, rated at 15.1 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $119,016 in the Germany market.
XPeng Mona M03 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS: Mercedes-Benz EQS is more powerful. Mercedes-Benz EQS makes about 39% more power (360 vs 218 hp). XPeng Mona M03 is the more efficient EV, using 11.5 kWh/100km against 15.1.
Performance
The Mercedes-Benz EQS is the more powerful, at 360 hp against 218 hp, with 568 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The XPeng Mona M03 is the more efficient EV, drawing 11.5 kWh/100km against 15.1 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
XPeng Mona M03 is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Mercedes-Benz EQS 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The XPeng Mona M03 lists lower at about $17,612 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the XPeng Mona M03 better than the Mercedes-Benz EQS?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Mercedes-Benz EQS makes about 39% more power (360 vs 218 hp).
What is the main difference between the XPeng Mona M03 and the Mercedes-Benz EQS?
Mercedes-Benz EQS makes about 39% more power (360 vs 218 hp). XPeng Mona M03 is the more efficient EV, using 11.5 kWh/100km against 15.1.
Which is better value?
XPeng Mona M03 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the XPeng Mona M03 if you want the lowest charging costs per km. Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQS if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.