Car Comparison

Xiaomi SU7 vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV

Verdict
Xiaomi SU7 vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: Xiaomi SU7 is more powerful

Head-to-head specifications

MetricXiaomi SU7Changan Qiyuan A07 EVDifference
Max power (hp)680258+163.6%
Max torque (Nm)840320+162.5%
Energy use (kWh/100km)13.212.3+7.3%
NCAP safety5★ (C-NCAP)5★ (C-NCAP)
Fuel typeElectricElectric
TransmissionSingle-speedSingle-speed
Price (USD est.)$43,386$24,766+75.2%
  • Xiaomi SU7 makes about 164% more power (680 vs 258 hp).
  • Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 13.2.

Verdict: SU7 or Qiyuan A07 EV?

Our recommendation
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay.

Xiaomi SU7 advantages

  • Engine power (+62%)
  • Pulling torque (+62%)

Changan Qiyuan A07 EV advantages

  • Energy efficiency (+7%)
  • Affordability (+43%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Xiaomi SU7 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
  • Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
  • Choose the Xiaomi SU7 if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.

Value for money

Xiaomi SU7 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Xiaomi SU7 vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: which should you choose?

Xiaomi SU7 (2026 Facelift Max AWD) — electric sedan with 680 hp and 840 Nm, rated at 13.2 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $43,386 in the China market.

Changan Qiyuan A07 EV (2023 515 Pro Edition) — electric sedan with 258 hp and 320 Nm, rated at 12.3 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $24,766 in the China market.

Xiaomi SU7 vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: Xiaomi SU7 is more powerful. Xiaomi SU7 makes about 164% more power (680 vs 258 hp). Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 13.2.

Performance

The Xiaomi SU7 is the more powerful, at 680 hp against 258 hp, with 840 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a single-speed transmission.

Running costs

The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, drawing 12.3 kWh/100km against 13.2 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.

Safety

Xiaomi SU7 is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Changan Qiyuan A07 EV 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.

Price and value

The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV lists lower at about $24,766 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Xiaomi SU7 better than the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?

These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Xiaomi SU7 makes about 164% more power (680 vs 258 hp).

What is the main difference between the Xiaomi SU7 and the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?

Xiaomi SU7 makes about 164% more power (680 vs 258 hp). Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 13.2.

Which is better value?

Xiaomi SU7 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Which should I choose?

Choose the Xiaomi SU7 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want the lowest charging costs per km.

Methodology

Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Xiaomi SU7 profile → Changan Qiyuan A07 EV profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons