Xiaomi SU7 Ultra vs Audi RS e-tron GT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Xiaomi SU7 Ultra | Audi RS e-tron GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 1,526 | 646 | +136.2% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 1,770 | 830 | +113.3% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 16.5 | 20.2 | -18.3% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Single-speed | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $74,186 | $153,900 | -51.8% |
- Xiaomi SU7 Ultra makes about 136% more power (1,526 vs 646 hp).
- Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is the more efficient EV, using 16.5 kWh/100km against 20.2.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: SU7 Ultra or RS e-tron GT?
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra advantages
- Engine power (+58%)
- Pulling torque (+53%)
- Energy efficiency (+18%)
- Affordability (+52%)
Audi RS e-tron GT advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra vs Audi RS e-tron GT: which should you choose?
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra (2025 AWD Tri-Motor) — electric sedan with 1526 hp and 1770 Nm, rated at 16.5 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $74,186 in the China market.
Audi RS e-tron GT (2024 RS e-tron GT quattro) — electric sedan with 646 hp and 830 Nm, rated at 20.2 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $153,900 in the Germany market.
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra vs Audi RS e-tron GT: Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is more powerful. Xiaomi SU7 Ultra makes about 136% more power (1,526 vs 646 hp). Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is the more efficient EV, using 16.5 kWh/100km against 20.2.
Performance
The Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is the more powerful, at 1,526 hp against 646 hp, with 1,770 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a single-speed transmission.
Running costs
The Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is the more efficient EV, drawing 16.5 kWh/100km against 20.2 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Audi RS e-tron GT 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Xiaomi SU7 Ultra lists lower at about $74,186 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra better than the Audi RS e-tron GT?
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Xiaomi SU7 Ultra makes about 136% more power (1,526 vs 646 hp).
What is the main difference between the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra and the Audi RS e-tron GT?
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra makes about 136% more power (1,526 vs 646 hp). Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is the more efficient EV, using 16.5 kWh/100km against 20.2.
Which is better value?
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.