Subaru Forester vs SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Subaru Forester | SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 145 | 220 | -34.1% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 188 | 350 | -46.3% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 14.0 | 11.6 | +20.7% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (JNCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Hybrid | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | CVT | 7-DCT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $21,120 | $47,950 | -56.0% |
- SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont makes about 34% more power (220 vs 145 hp).
- Subaru Forester is the more economical, at 14.0 km/L against 11.6.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Japan and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Forester or Teramont?
Subaru Forester advantages
- Fuel economy (+17%)
- Affordability (+56%)
SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont advantages
- Engine power (+34%)
- Pulling torque (+46%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Subaru Forester if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Subaru Forester if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
Subaru Forester delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Subaru Forester vs SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont: which should you choose?
Subaru Forester (2026 Touring e-Boxer) — hybrid suv with 145 hp and 188 Nm, rated at 14 km/L, 5-star JNCAP safety; priced near $21,120 in the Japan market.
SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont (2022 380TSI DSG Luxury AWD) — petrol suv with 220 hp and 350 Nm, rated at 11.6 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $47,950 in the China market.
Subaru Forester vs SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont: SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont is more powerful. SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont makes about 34% more power (220 vs 145 hp). Subaru Forester is the more economical, at 14.0 km/L against 11.6.
Performance
The SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont is the more powerful, at 220 hp against 145 hp, with 350 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 7-dct transmission.
Running costs
The Subaru Forester is more economical at 14.0 km/L against 11.6 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
Subaru Forester is rated 5 stars by JNCAP and SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Subaru Forester lists lower at about $21,120 (USD-converted from the Japan market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Subaru Forester better than the SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont makes about 34% more power (220 vs 145 hp).
What is the main difference between the Subaru Forester and the SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont?
SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont makes about 34% more power (220 vs 145 hp). Subaru Forester is the more economical, at 14.0 km/L against 11.6.
Which is better value?
Subaru Forester delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Subaru Forester if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter. Choose the SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.