Skoda Fabia vs SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Skoda Fabia | SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 95 | 220 | -56.8% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 175 | 350 | -50.0% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 20.0 | 11.6 | +72.4% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | Manual | 7-DCT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $25,272 | $47,950 | -47.3% |
- SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont makes about 57% more power (220 vs 95 hp).
- Skoda Fabia is the more economical, at 20.0 km/L against 11.6.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (EU and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Fabia or Teramont?
Skoda Fabia advantages
- Fuel economy (+42%)
- Affordability (+47%)
SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont advantages
- Engine power (+57%)
- Pulling torque (+50%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Skoda Fabia if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Skoda Fabia if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Skoda Fabia vs SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont: which should you choose?
Skoda Fabia (2026 1.0 TSI Style) — petrol hatchback with 95 hp and 175 Nm, rated at 20 km/L, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $25,272 in the EU market.
SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont (2022 380TSI DSG Luxury AWD) — petrol suv with 220 hp and 350 Nm, rated at 11.6 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $47,950 in the China market.
Skoda Fabia vs SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont: SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont is more powerful. SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont makes about 57% more power (220 vs 95 hp). Skoda Fabia is the more economical, at 20.0 km/L against 11.6.
Performance
The SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont is the more powerful, at 220 hp against 95 hp, with 350 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 7-dct transmission.
Running costs
The Skoda Fabia is more economical at 20.0 km/L against 11.6 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
Skoda Fabia is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Skoda Fabia lists lower at about $25,272 (USD-converted from the EU market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Skoda Fabia better than the SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont makes about 57% more power (220 vs 95 hp).
What is the main difference between the Skoda Fabia and the SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont?
SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont makes about 57% more power (220 vs 95 hp). Skoda Fabia is the more economical, at 20.0 km/L against 11.6.
Which is better value?
SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Skoda Fabia if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter. Choose the SAIC-Volkswagen Teramont if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.