Skoda Enyaq iV vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Skoda Enyaq iV | Changan Qiyuan A07 EV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 286 | 258 | +10.9% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 545 | 320 | +70.3% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 15.6 | 12.3 | +26.8% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | Single-speed | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $63,396 | $24,766 | +156.0% |
- Skoda Enyaq iV makes about 11% more power (286 vs 258 hp).
- Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 15.6.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (EU and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Enyaq iV or Qiyuan A07 EV?
Skoda Enyaq iV advantages
- Engine power (+10%)
- Pulling torque (+41%)
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV advantages
- Energy efficiency (+21%)
- Affordability (+61%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Skoda Enyaq iV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Skoda Enyaq iV if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Skoda Enyaq iV vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: which should you choose?
Skoda Enyaq iV (2026 85 Edition) — electric suv with 286 hp and 545 Nm, rated at 15.6 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $63,396 in the EU market.
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV (2023 515 Pro Edition) — electric sedan with 258 hp and 320 Nm, rated at 12.3 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $24,766 in the China market.
Skoda Enyaq iV vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: Skoda Enyaq iV is more powerful. Skoda Enyaq iV makes about 11% more power (286 vs 258 hp). Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 15.6.
Performance
The Skoda Enyaq iV is the more powerful, at 286 hp against 258 hp, with 545 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, drawing 12.3 kWh/100km against 15.6 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
Skoda Enyaq iV is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Changan Qiyuan A07 EV 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV lists lower at about $24,766 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Skoda Enyaq iV better than the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Skoda Enyaq iV makes about 11% more power (286 vs 258 hp).
What is the main difference between the Skoda Enyaq iV and the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?
Skoda Enyaq iV makes about 11% more power (286 vs 258 hp). Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 15.6.
Which is better value?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Skoda Enyaq iV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.