Peugeot e-208 vs Skoda Octavia Combi
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Peugeot e-208 | Skoda Octavia Combi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 156 | 150 | +4.0% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 260 | 360 | -27.8% |
| NCAP safety | 4★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Diesel | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | DSG | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $46,548 | $39,744 | +17.1% |
- Peugeot e-208 makes about 4% more power (156 vs 150 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Diesel), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (EU and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: e-208 or Octavia Combi?
Peugeot e-208 advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Skoda Octavia Combi advantages
- Pulling torque (+28%)
- Crash-test safety (+20%)
- Affordability (+15%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Skoda Octavia Combi if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Skoda Octavia Combi delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Peugeot e-208 vs Skoda Octavia Combi: which should you choose?
Peugeot e-208 (2026 e-208 GT 54 kWh) — electric hatchback with 156 hp and 260 Nm, rated at 14 kWh/100km, 4-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $46,548 in the EU market.
Skoda Octavia Combi (2024 2.0 TDI Facelift) — diesel station wagon with 150 hp and 360 Nm, rated at 22.2 km/L, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $39,744 in the Germany market.
Peugeot e-208 vs Skoda Octavia Combi: Peugeot e-208 is more powerful. Peugeot e-208 makes about 4% more power (156 vs 150 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Diesel), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Peugeot e-208 is the more powerful, at 156 hp against 150 hp, with 260 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Electric vs Diesel), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
Peugeot e-208 is rated 4 stars by Euro NCAP and Skoda Octavia Combi 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Skoda Octavia Combi lists lower at about $39,744 (USD-converted from the Germany market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Peugeot e-208 better than the Skoda Octavia Combi?
Skoda Octavia Combi is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Peugeot e-208 makes about 4% more power (156 vs 150 hp).
What is the main difference between the Peugeot e-208 and the Skoda Octavia Combi?
Peugeot e-208 makes about 4% more power (156 vs 150 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Diesel), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Skoda Octavia Combi delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Skoda Octavia Combi if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.