NIO Firefly EV vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | NIO Firefly EV | Changan Qiyuan A07 EV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 177 | 258 | -31.4% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 240 | 320 | -25.0% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 11.2 | 12.3 | -8.9% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Single-speed | Single-speed | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $22,372 | $24,766 | -9.7% |
- Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 31% more power (258 vs 177 hp).
- NIO Firefly EV is the more efficient EV, using 11.2 kWh/100km against 12.3.
Verdict: Firefly EV or Qiyuan A07 EV?
NIO Firefly EV advantages
- Energy efficiency (+9%)
- Affordability (+10%)
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV advantages
- Engine power (+31%)
- Pulling torque (+25%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the NIO Firefly EV if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the NIO Firefly EV if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
NIO Firefly EV vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: which should you choose?
NIO Firefly EV (2026 Debut Edition 50kWh RWD) — electric suv with 177 hp and 240 Nm, rated at 11.2 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $22,372 in the China market.
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV (2023 515 Pro Edition) — electric sedan with 258 hp and 320 Nm, rated at 12.3 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $24,766 in the China market.
NIO Firefly EV vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is more powerful. Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 31% more power (258 vs 177 hp). NIO Firefly EV is the more efficient EV, using 11.2 kWh/100km against 12.3.
Performance
The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more powerful, at 258 hp against 177 hp, with 320 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a single-speed transmission.
Running costs
The NIO Firefly EV is the more efficient EV, drawing 11.2 kWh/100km against 12.3 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
NIO Firefly EV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Changan Qiyuan A07 EV 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The NIO Firefly EV lists lower at about $22,372 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the NIO Firefly EV better than the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 31% more power (258 vs 177 hp).
What is the main difference between the NIO Firefly EV and the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 31% more power (258 vs 177 hp). NIO Firefly EV is the more efficient EV, using 11.2 kWh/100km against 12.3.
Which is better value?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the NIO Firefly EV if you want the lowest charging costs per km. Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.