Mitsubishi Delica Mini vs Ford Explorer
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Mitsubishi Delica Mini | Ford Explorer | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 64 | 400 | -84.0% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 100 | 563 | -82.2% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 17.5 | 8.5 | +105.9% |
| NCAP safety | 4★ (JNCAP) | 5★ (NHTSA) | — |
| Fuel type | Hybrid | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | CVT | 10-Speed Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $14,058 | $57,200 | -75.4% |
- Ford Explorer makes about 84% more power (400 vs 64 hp).
- Mitsubishi Delica Mini is the more economical, at 17.5 km/L against 8.5.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Japan and US); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Delica Mini or Explorer?
Mitsubishi Delica Mini advantages
- Fuel economy (+51%)
- Affordability (+75%)
Ford Explorer advantages
- Engine power (+84%)
- Pulling torque (+82%)
- Crash-test safety (+20%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Mitsubishi Delica Mini if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the Ford Explorer if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Mitsubishi Delica Mini if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
Ford Explorer delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Mitsubishi Delica Mini vs Ford Explorer: which should you choose?
Mitsubishi Delica Mini (2026 T Premium Turbo) — hybrid kei suv with 64 hp and 100 Nm, rated at 17.5 km/L, 4-star JNCAP safety; priced near $14,058 in the Japan market.
Ford Explorer (2026 ST AWD) — petrol suv with 400 hp and 563 Nm, rated at 8.5 km/L, 5-star NHTSA safety; priced near $57,200 in the US market.
Mitsubishi Delica Mini vs Ford Explorer: Ford Explorer is more powerful. Ford Explorer makes about 84% more power (400 vs 64 hp). Mitsubishi Delica Mini is the more economical, at 17.5 km/L against 8.5.
Performance
The Ford Explorer is the more powerful, at 400 hp against 64 hp, with 563 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 10-speed automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Mitsubishi Delica Mini is more economical at 17.5 km/L against 8.5 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
Mitsubishi Delica Mini is rated 4 stars by JNCAP and Ford Explorer 5 stars by NHTSA. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Mitsubishi Delica Mini lists lower at about $14,058 (USD-converted from the Japan market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Mitsubishi Delica Mini better than the Ford Explorer?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Ford Explorer makes about 84% more power (400 vs 64 hp).
What is the main difference between the Mitsubishi Delica Mini and the Ford Explorer?
Ford Explorer makes about 84% more power (400 vs 64 hp). Mitsubishi Delica Mini is the more economical, at 17.5 km/L against 8.5.
Which is better value?
Ford Explorer delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Mitsubishi Delica Mini if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter. Choose the Ford Explorer if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.