MG Gloster vs Tata Motors Harrier EV
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | MG Gloster | Tata Motors Harrier EV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 213 | 218 | -2.3% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 480 | 450 | +6.7% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Global NCAP/BNCAP) | 5★ (Global NCAP/BNCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Diesel | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $46,788 | $35,400 | +32.2% |
- Tata Motors Harrier EV makes about 2% more power (218 vs 213 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Diesel vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Verdict: Gloster or Harrier EV?
MG Gloster advantages
- Pulling torque (+6%)
Tata Motors Harrier EV advantages
- Affordability (+24%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the MG Gloster if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
- Choose the Tata Motors Harrier EV if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
Tata Motors Harrier EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
MG Gloster vs Tata Motors Harrier EV: which should you choose?
MG Gloster (2025 Savvy Pro 4WD) — diesel suv with 213 hp and 480 Nm, rated at 12.4 km/L, 5-star Global NCAP/BNCAP safety; priced near $46,788 in the India market.
Tata Motors Harrier EV (2026 Fearless AWD) — electric suv with 218 hp and 450 Nm, 5-star Global NCAP/BNCAP safety; priced near $35,400 in the India market.
MG Gloster vs Tata Motors Harrier EV: Tata Motors Harrier EV is more powerful. Tata Motors Harrier EV makes about 2% more power (218 vs 213 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Diesel vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Tata Motors Harrier EV is the more powerful, at 218 hp against 213 hp, with 450 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Diesel vs Electric), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
MG Gloster is rated 5 stars by Global NCAP/BNCAP and Tata Motors Harrier EV 5 stars by Global NCAP/BNCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Tata Motors Harrier EV lists lower at about $35,400 (USD-converted from the India market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the MG Gloster better than the Tata Motors Harrier EV?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Tata Motors Harrier EV makes about 2% more power (218 vs 213 hp).
What is the main difference between the MG Gloster and the Tata Motors Harrier EV?
Tata Motors Harrier EV makes about 2% more power (218 vs 213 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Diesel vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Tata Motors Harrier EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the MG Gloster if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads. Choose the Tata Motors Harrier EV if you want the lower upfront cost.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.