MG Gloster vs Skoda Superb Combi iV
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | MG Gloster | Skoda Superb Combi iV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 213 | 204 | +4.4% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 480 | 350 | +37.1% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 12.4 | 250.0 | -95.0% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Global NCAP/BNCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Diesel | Plug-in Hybrid | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | DSG | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $46,788 | $53,136 | -11.9% |
- MG Gloster makes about 4% more power (213 vs 204 hp).
- Skoda Superb Combi iV is the more economical, at 250.0 km/L against 12.4.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (India and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Gloster or Superb Combi iV?
MG Gloster advantages
- Engine power (+4%)
- Pulling torque (+27%)
- Affordability (+12%)
Skoda Superb Combi iV advantages
- Fuel economy (+95%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the MG Gloster if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Skoda Superb Combi iV if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the MG Gloster if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
MG Gloster delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
MG Gloster vs Skoda Superb Combi iV: which should you choose?
MG Gloster (2025 Savvy Pro 4WD) — diesel suv with 213 hp and 480 Nm, rated at 12.4 km/L, 5-star Global NCAP/BNCAP safety; priced near $46,788 in the India market.
Skoda Superb Combi iV (2024 eHybrid (New Gen)) — plug-in hybrid station wagon with 204 hp and 350 Nm, rated at 250 km/L, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $53,136 in the Germany market.
MG Gloster vs Skoda Superb Combi iV: MG Gloster is more powerful. MG Gloster makes about 4% more power (213 vs 204 hp). Skoda Superb Combi iV is the more economical, at 250.0 km/L against 12.4.
Performance
The MG Gloster is the more powerful, at 213 hp against 204 hp, with 480 Nm of torque on tap. Its diesel drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Skoda Superb Combi iV is more economical at 250.0 km/L against 12.4 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
MG Gloster is rated 5 stars by Global NCAP/BNCAP and Skoda Superb Combi iV 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The MG Gloster lists lower at about $46,788 (USD-converted from the India market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the MG Gloster better than the Skoda Superb Combi iV?
MG Gloster takes the overall edge, though Skoda Superb Combi iV wins in specific areas worth weighing. MG Gloster makes about 4% more power (213 vs 204 hp).
What is the main difference between the MG Gloster and the Skoda Superb Combi iV?
MG Gloster makes about 4% more power (213 vs 204 hp). Skoda Superb Combi iV is the more economical, at 250.0 km/L against 12.4.
Which is better value?
MG Gloster delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the MG Gloster if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Skoda Superb Combi iV if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.