MG Gloster vs SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | MG Gloster | SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 213 | 220 | -3.2% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 480 | 350 | +37.1% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 12.4 | 15.9 | -22.0% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Global NCAP/BNCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Diesel | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | 7-DCT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $46,788 | $30,786 | +52.0% |
- SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro makes about 3% more power (220 vs 213 hp).
- SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro is the more economical, at 15.9 km/L against 12.4.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (India and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Gloster or Passat Pro?
MG Gloster advantages
- Pulling torque (+27%)
SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro advantages
- Fuel economy (+22%)
- Affordability (+34%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the MG Gloster if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
- Choose the SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Value for money
SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
MG Gloster vs SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro: which should you choose?
MG Gloster (2025 Savvy Pro 4WD) — diesel suv with 213 hp and 480 Nm, rated at 12.4 km/L, 5-star Global NCAP/BNCAP safety; priced near $46,788 in the India market.
SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro (2026 380TSI Executive Elite) — petrol sedan with 220 hp and 350 Nm, rated at 15.9 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $30,786 in the China market.
MG Gloster vs SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro: SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro is more powerful. SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro makes about 3% more power (220 vs 213 hp). SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro is the more economical, at 15.9 km/L against 12.4.
Performance
The SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro is the more powerful, at 220 hp against 213 hp, with 350 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 7-dct transmission.
Running costs
The SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro is more economical at 15.9 km/L against 12.4 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
MG Gloster is rated 5 stars by Global NCAP/BNCAP and SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro lists lower at about $30,786 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the MG Gloster better than the SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro?
SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro takes the overall edge, though MG Gloster wins in specific areas worth weighing. SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro makes about 3% more power (220 vs 213 hp).
What is the main difference between the MG Gloster and the SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro?
SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro makes about 3% more power (220 vs 213 hp). SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro is the more economical, at 15.9 km/L against 12.4.
Which is better value?
SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the MG Gloster if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads. Choose the SAIC-Volkswagen Passat Pro if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.