MG Gloster vs SAIC-Volkswagen Passat
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | MG Gloster | SAIC-Volkswagen Passat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 213 | 150 | +42.0% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 480 | 250 | +92.0% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 12.4 | 17.2 | -27.9% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Global NCAP/BNCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Diesel | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | 7-DCT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $46,788 | $25,186 | +85.8% |
- MG Gloster makes about 42% more power (213 vs 150 hp).
- SAIC-Volkswagen Passat is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 12.4.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (India and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Gloster or Passat?
MG Gloster advantages
- Engine power (+30%)
- Pulling torque (+48%)
SAIC-Volkswagen Passat advantages
- Fuel economy (+28%)
- Affordability (+46%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the MG Gloster if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the SAIC-Volkswagen Passat if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the MG Gloster if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
SAIC-Volkswagen Passat delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
MG Gloster vs SAIC-Volkswagen Passat: which should you choose?
MG Gloster (2025 Savvy Pro 4WD) — diesel suv with 213 hp and 480 Nm, rated at 12.4 km/L, 5-star Global NCAP/BNCAP safety; priced near $46,788 in the India market.
SAIC-Volkswagen Passat (2021 280TSI DSG Business) — petrol sedan with 150 hp and 250 Nm, rated at 17.2 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $25,186 in the China market.
MG Gloster vs SAIC-Volkswagen Passat: MG Gloster is more powerful. MG Gloster makes about 42% more power (213 vs 150 hp). SAIC-Volkswagen Passat is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 12.4.
Performance
The MG Gloster is the more powerful, at 213 hp against 150 hp, with 480 Nm of torque on tap. Its diesel drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The SAIC-Volkswagen Passat is more economical at 17.2 km/L against 12.4 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
MG Gloster is rated 5 stars by Global NCAP/BNCAP and SAIC-Volkswagen Passat 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The SAIC-Volkswagen Passat lists lower at about $25,186 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the MG Gloster better than the SAIC-Volkswagen Passat?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. MG Gloster makes about 42% more power (213 vs 150 hp).
What is the main difference between the MG Gloster and the SAIC-Volkswagen Passat?
MG Gloster makes about 42% more power (213 vs 150 hp). SAIC-Volkswagen Passat is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 12.4.
Which is better value?
SAIC-Volkswagen Passat delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the MG Gloster if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the SAIC-Volkswagen Passat if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.