MG Gloster vs Mitsubishi Xpander
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | MG Gloster | Mitsubishi Xpander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 213 | 105 | +102.9% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 480 | 141 | +240.4% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 12.4 | 16.1 | -23.0% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Global NCAP/BNCAP) | 4★ (ASEAN NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Diesel | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | CVT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $46,788 | $23,058 | +102.9% |
- MG Gloster makes about 103% more power (213 vs 105 hp).
- Mitsubishi Xpander is the more economical, at 16.1 km/L against 12.4.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (India and Malaysia); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Gloster or Xpander?
MG Gloster advantages
- Engine power (+51%)
- Pulling torque (+71%)
- Crash-test safety (+20%)
Mitsubishi Xpander advantages
- Fuel economy (+23%)
- Affordability (+51%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the MG Gloster if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Mitsubishi Xpander if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the MG Gloster if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Mitsubishi Xpander delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
MG Gloster vs Mitsubishi Xpander: which should you choose?
MG Gloster (2025 Savvy Pro 4WD) — diesel suv with 213 hp and 480 Nm, rated at 12.4 km/L, 5-star Global NCAP/BNCAP safety; priced near $46,788 in the India market.
Mitsubishi Xpander (2024 1.5 AT Facelift) — petrol mpv with 105 hp and 141 Nm, rated at 16.1 km/L, 4-star ASEAN NCAP safety; priced near $23,058 in the Malaysia market.
MG Gloster vs Mitsubishi Xpander: MG Gloster is more powerful. MG Gloster makes about 103% more power (213 vs 105 hp). Mitsubishi Xpander is the more economical, at 16.1 km/L against 12.4.
Performance
The MG Gloster is the more powerful, at 213 hp against 105 hp, with 480 Nm of torque on tap. Its diesel drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Mitsubishi Xpander is more economical at 16.1 km/L against 12.4 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
MG Gloster is rated 5 stars by Global NCAP/BNCAP and Mitsubishi Xpander 4 stars by ASEAN NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Mitsubishi Xpander lists lower at about $23,058 (USD-converted from the Malaysia market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the MG Gloster better than the Mitsubishi Xpander?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. MG Gloster makes about 103% more power (213 vs 105 hp).
What is the main difference between the MG Gloster and the Mitsubishi Xpander?
MG Gloster makes about 103% more power (213 vs 105 hp). Mitsubishi Xpander is the more economical, at 16.1 km/L against 12.4.
Which is better value?
Mitsubishi Xpander delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the MG Gloster if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Mitsubishi Xpander if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.