Mercedes-Benz EQS vs Toyota Harrier
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Mercedes-Benz EQS | Toyota Harrier | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 360 | 218 | +65.1% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 568 | 221 | +157.0% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (JNCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Hybrid | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | eCVT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $119,016 | $31,284 | +280.4% |
- Mercedes-Benz EQS makes about 65% more power (360 vs 218 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Hybrid), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Germany and Japan); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: EQS or Harrier?
Mercedes-Benz EQS advantages
- Engine power (+39%)
- Pulling torque (+61%)
Toyota Harrier advantages
- Affordability (+74%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQS if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Toyota Harrier if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQS if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Toyota Harrier delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Mercedes-Benz EQS vs Toyota Harrier: which should you choose?
Mercedes-Benz EQS (2024 EQS 450+ Facelift) — electric sedan with 360 hp and 568 Nm, rated at 15.1 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $119,016 in the Germany market.
Toyota Harrier (2026 Z Hybrid) — hybrid suv with 218 hp and 221 Nm, rated at 22.3 km/L, 5-star JNCAP safety; priced near $31,284 in the Japan market.
Mercedes-Benz EQS vs Toyota Harrier: Mercedes-Benz EQS is more powerful. Mercedes-Benz EQS makes about 65% more power (360 vs 218 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Hybrid), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Mercedes-Benz EQS is the more powerful, at 360 hp against 218 hp, with 568 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Electric vs Hybrid), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
Mercedes-Benz EQS is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Toyota Harrier 5 stars by JNCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Toyota Harrier lists lower at about $31,284 (USD-converted from the Japan market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Mercedes-Benz EQS better than the Toyota Harrier?
Mercedes-Benz EQS takes the overall edge, though Toyota Harrier wins in specific areas worth weighing. Mercedes-Benz EQS makes about 65% more power (360 vs 218 hp).
What is the main difference between the Mercedes-Benz EQS and the Toyota Harrier?
Mercedes-Benz EQS makes about 65% more power (360 vs 218 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Hybrid), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Toyota Harrier delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQS if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Toyota Harrier if you want the lower upfront cost.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.