Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Mercedes-Benz EQA | Hyundai Ioniq 5 N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 190 | 650 | -70.8% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 375 | 770 | -51.3% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 15.7 | 21.2 | -25.9% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $62,100 | $80,892 | -23.2% |
- Hyundai Ioniq 5 N makes about 71% more power (650 vs 190 hp).
- Mercedes-Benz EQA is the more efficient EV, using 15.7 kWh/100km against 21.2.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (EU and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: EQA or Ioniq 5 N?
Mercedes-Benz EQA advantages
- Energy efficiency (+26%)
- Affordability (+23%)
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N advantages
- Engine power (+71%)
- Pulling torque (+51%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQA if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQA if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Hyundai Ioniq 5 N: which should you choose?
Mercedes-Benz EQA (2026 EQA 250 AMG Line) — electric suv with 190 hp and 375 Nm, rated at 15.7 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $62,100 in the EU market.
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N (2024 84 kWh N) — electric suv with 650 hp and 770 Nm, rated at 21.2 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $80,892 in the Germany market.
Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Hyundai Ioniq 5 N: Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is more powerful. Hyundai Ioniq 5 N makes about 71% more power (650 vs 190 hp). Mercedes-Benz EQA is the more efficient EV, using 15.7 kWh/100km against 21.2.
Performance
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is the more powerful, at 650 hp against 190 hp, with 770 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Mercedes-Benz EQA is the more efficient EV, drawing 15.7 kWh/100km against 21.2 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
Mercedes-Benz EQA is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Mercedes-Benz EQA lists lower at about $62,100 (USD-converted from the EU market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Mercedes-Benz EQA better than the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Hyundai Ioniq 5 N makes about 71% more power (650 vs 190 hp).
What is the main difference between the Mercedes-Benz EQA and the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N?
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N makes about 71% more power (650 vs 190 hp). Mercedes-Benz EQA is the more efficient EV, using 15.7 kWh/100km against 21.2.
Which is better value?
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQA if you want the lowest charging costs per km. Choose the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.