Mazda CX-30 vs BMW iX
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Mazda CX-30 | BMW iX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 130 | 523 | -75.1% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 270 | 765 | -64.7% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (JNCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Diesel | Electric | — |
| Transmission | 6AT | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $21,384 | $105,840 | -79.8% |
- BMW iX makes about 75% more power (523 vs 130 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Diesel vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Japan and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: CX-30 or iX?
Mazda CX-30 advantages
- Affordability (+80%)
BMW iX advantages
- Engine power (+75%)
- Pulling torque (+65%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Mazda CX-30 if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the BMW iX if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Value for money
Mazda CX-30 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Mazda CX-30 vs BMW iX: which should you choose?
Mazda CX-30 (2026 XD L Package) — diesel suv with 130 hp and 270 Nm, rated at 19.2 km/L, 5-star JNCAP safety; priced near $21,384 in the Japan market.
BMW iX (2022 xDrive50) — electric suv with 523 hp and 765 Nm, rated at 19.8 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $105,840 in the Germany market.
Mazda CX-30 vs BMW iX: BMW iX is more powerful. BMW iX makes about 75% more power (523 vs 130 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Diesel vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The BMW iX is the more powerful, at 523 hp against 130 hp, with 765 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Diesel vs Electric), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
Mazda CX-30 is rated 5 stars by JNCAP and BMW iX 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Mazda CX-30 lists lower at about $21,384 (USD-converted from the Japan market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Mazda CX-30 better than the BMW iX?
BMW iX takes the overall edge, though Mazda CX-30 wins in specific areas worth weighing. BMW iX makes about 75% more power (523 vs 130 hp).
What is the main difference between the Mazda CX-30 and the BMW iX?
BMW iX makes about 75% more power (523 vs 130 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Diesel vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Mazda CX-30 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Mazda CX-30 if you want the lower upfront cost. Choose the BMW iX if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.