Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 vs Kia Sportage
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 | Kia Sportage | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 47 | 230 | -79.6% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 69 | 350 | -80.3% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 22.1 | 17.9 | +23.2% |
| NCAP safety | 0★ (Global NCAP/BNCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Hybrid | — |
| Transmission | Manual | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $4,236 | $50,436 | -91.6% |
- Kia Sportage makes about 80% more power (230 vs 47 hp).
- Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 is the more economical, at 22.1 km/L against 17.9.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (India and EU); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Alto 800 or Sportage?
Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 advantages
- Fuel economy (+19%)
- Affordability (+92%)
Kia Sportage advantages
- Engine power (+80%)
- Pulling torque (+80%)
- Crash-test safety (+100%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the Kia Sportage if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 vs Kia Sportage: which should you choose?
Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 (2020 LXI) — petrol hatchback with 47 hp and 69 Nm, rated at 22.05 km/L; priced near $4,236 in the India market.
Kia Sportage (2026 1.6 T-GDI HEV GT-Line S) — hybrid suv with 230 hp and 350 Nm, rated at 17.9 km/L, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $50,436 in the EU market.
Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 vs Kia Sportage: Kia Sportage is more powerful. Kia Sportage makes about 80% more power (230 vs 47 hp). Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 is the more economical, at 22.1 km/L against 17.9.
Performance
The Kia Sportage is the more powerful, at 230 hp against 47 hp, with 350 Nm of torque on tap. Its hybrid drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 is more economical at 22.1 km/L against 17.9 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 is rated 0 stars by Global NCAP/BNCAP and Kia Sportage 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 lists lower at about $4,236 (USD-converted from the India market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 better than the Kia Sportage?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Kia Sportage makes about 80% more power (230 vs 47 hp).
What is the main difference between the Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 and the Kia Sportage?
Kia Sportage makes about 80% more power (230 vs 47 hp). Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 is the more economical, at 22.1 km/L against 17.9.
Which is better value?
Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Maruti Suzuki Alto 800 if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter. Choose the Kia Sportage if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.