Lexus ES vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Lexus ES | Changan Qiyuan A07 EV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 302 | 258 | +17.1% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 362 | 320 | +13.1% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (GNCAP-GCC) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Electric | — |
| Transmission | 8-Speed Automatic | Single-speed | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $66,714 | $24,766 | +169.4% |
- Lexus ES makes about 17% more power (302 vs 258 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Gulf (UAE/KSA) and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: ES or Qiyuan A07 EV?
Lexus ES advantages
- Engine power (+15%)
- Pulling torque (+12%)
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV advantages
- Affordability (+63%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Lexus ES if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the Lexus ES if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Lexus ES vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: which should you choose?
Lexus ES (2026 350 F Sport V6) — petrol sedan with 302 hp and 362 Nm, rated at 12 km/L, 5-star GNCAP-GCC safety; priced near $66,714 in the Gulf (UAE/KSA) market.
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV (2023 515 Pro Edition) — electric sedan with 258 hp and 320 Nm, rated at 12.3 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $24,766 in the China market.
Lexus ES vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: Lexus ES is more powerful. Lexus ES makes about 17% more power (302 vs 258 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Lexus ES is the more powerful, at 302 hp against 258 hp, with 362 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 8-speed automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Petrol vs Electric), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
Lexus ES is rated 5 stars by GNCAP-GCC and Changan Qiyuan A07 EV 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV lists lower at about $24,766 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Lexus ES better than the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?
Lexus ES takes the overall edge, though Changan Qiyuan A07 EV wins in specific areas worth weighing. Lexus ES makes about 17% more power (302 vs 258 hp).
What is the main difference between the Lexus ES and the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?
Lexus ES makes about 17% more power (302 vs 258 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Lexus ES if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want the lower upfront cost.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.