Hyundai Kona Electric vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Hyundai Kona Electric | Changan Qiyuan A07 EV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 218 | 258 | -15.5% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 255 | 320 | -20.3% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 14.8 | 12.3 | +20.3% |
| NCAP safety | 4★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | Single-speed | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $51,732 | $24,766 | +108.9% |
- Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 16% more power (258 vs 218 hp).
- Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 14.8.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (EU and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Kona Electric or Qiyuan A07 EV?
Hyundai Kona Electric advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV advantages
- Engine power (+16%)
- Pulling torque (+20%)
- Energy efficiency (+17%)
- Crash-test safety (+20%)
- Affordability (+52%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Value for money
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Hyundai Kona Electric vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: which should you choose?
Hyundai Kona Electric (2026 Kona Electric Ultimate 65.4 kWh) — electric suv with 218 hp and 255 Nm, rated at 14.8 kWh/100km, 4-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $51,732 in the EU market.
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV (2023 515 Pro Edition) — electric sedan with 258 hp and 320 Nm, rated at 12.3 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $24,766 in the China market.
Hyundai Kona Electric vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is more powerful. Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 16% more power (258 vs 218 hp). Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 14.8.
Performance
The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more powerful, at 258 hp against 218 hp, with 320 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a single-speed transmission.
Running costs
The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, drawing 12.3 kWh/100km against 14.8 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
Hyundai Kona Electric is rated 4 stars by Euro NCAP and Changan Qiyuan A07 EV 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV lists lower at about $24,766 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Hyundai Kona Electric better than the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 16% more power (258 vs 218 hp).
What is the main difference between the Hyundai Kona Electric and the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 16% more power (258 vs 218 hp). Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 14.8.
Which is better value?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.