Honda WR-V vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Honda WR-V | Changan Qiyuan A07 EV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 121 | 258 | -53.1% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 145 | 320 | -54.7% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (ASEAN NCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Electric | — |
| Transmission | CVT | Single-speed | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $22,659 | $24,766 | -8.5% |
- Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 53% more power (258 vs 121 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Malaysia and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: WR-V or Qiyuan A07 EV?
Honda WR-V advantages
- Affordability (+9%)
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV advantages
- Engine power (+53%)
- Pulling torque (+55%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Honda WR-V if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Value for money
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Honda WR-V vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: which should you choose?
Honda WR-V (2026 1.5 RS) — petrol suv with 121 hp and 145 Nm, rated at 16.7 km/L, 5-star ASEAN NCAP safety; priced near $22,659 in the Malaysia market.
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV (2023 515 Pro Edition) — electric sedan with 258 hp and 320 Nm, rated at 12.3 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $24,766 in the China market.
Honda WR-V vs Changan Qiyuan A07 EV: Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is more powerful. Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 53% more power (258 vs 121 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more powerful, at 258 hp against 121 hp, with 320 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a single-speed transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Petrol vs Electric), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
Honda WR-V is rated 5 stars by ASEAN NCAP and Changan Qiyuan A07 EV 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Honda WR-V lists lower at about $22,659 (USD-converted from the Malaysia market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Honda WR-V better than the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV takes the overall edge, though Honda WR-V wins in specific areas worth weighing. Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 53% more power (258 vs 121 hp).
What is the main difference between the Honda WR-V and the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 53% more power (258 vs 121 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Honda WR-V if you want the lower upfront cost. Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.