Geely Boyue PRO vs Skoda Kushaq Facelift
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Geely Boyue PRO | Skoda Kushaq Facelift | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 184 | 114 | +61.4% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 300 | 178 | +68.5% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 13.3 | 18.5 | -28.1% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (Global NCAP/BNCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | 7-DCT | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $17,752 | $19,800 | -10.3% |
- Geely Boyue PRO makes about 61% more power (184 vs 114 hp).
- Skoda Kushaq Facelift is the more economical, at 18.5 km/L against 13.3.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and India); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Boyue PRO or Kushaq Facelift?
Geely Boyue PRO advantages
- Engine power (+38%)
- Pulling torque (+41%)
- Affordability (+10%)
Skoda Kushaq Facelift advantages
- Fuel economy (+28%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Geely Boyue PRO if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Skoda Kushaq Facelift if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the Geely Boyue PRO if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Geely Boyue PRO delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Geely Boyue PRO vs Skoda Kushaq Facelift: which should you choose?
Geely Boyue PRO (2020 1.8TD DCT Smart) — petrol suv with 184 hp and 300 Nm, rated at 13.3 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $17,752 in the China market.
Skoda Kushaq Facelift (2026 Style) — petrol suv with 114 hp and 178 Nm, rated at 18.5 km/L, 5-star Global NCAP/BNCAP safety; priced near $19,800 in the India market.
Geely Boyue PRO vs Skoda Kushaq Facelift: Geely Boyue PRO is more powerful. Geely Boyue PRO makes about 61% more power (184 vs 114 hp). Skoda Kushaq Facelift is the more economical, at 18.5 km/L against 13.3.
Performance
The Geely Boyue PRO is the more powerful, at 184 hp against 114 hp, with 300 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 7-dct transmission.
Running costs
The Skoda Kushaq Facelift is more economical at 18.5 km/L against 13.3 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
Geely Boyue PRO is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Skoda Kushaq Facelift 5 stars by Global NCAP/BNCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Geely Boyue PRO lists lower at about $17,752 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Geely Boyue PRO better than the Skoda Kushaq Facelift?
Geely Boyue PRO takes the overall edge, though Skoda Kushaq Facelift wins in specific areas worth weighing. Geely Boyue PRO makes about 61% more power (184 vs 114 hp).
What is the main difference between the Geely Boyue PRO and the Skoda Kushaq Facelift?
Geely Boyue PRO makes about 61% more power (184 vs 114 hp). Skoda Kushaq Facelift is the more economical, at 18.5 km/L against 13.3.
Which is better value?
Geely Boyue PRO delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Geely Boyue PRO if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Skoda Kushaq Facelift if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.