GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV vs BMW M3
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV | BMW M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 306 | 510 | -40.0% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 391 | 650 | -39.8% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 83.3 | 9.9 | +741.4% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Plug-in Hybrid | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | E-CVT | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $40,712 | $108,324 | -62.4% |
- BMW M3 makes about 40% more power (510 vs 306 hp).
- GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV is the more economical, at 83.3 km/L against 9.9.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Wildlander PHEV or M3?
GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV advantages
- Fuel economy (+88%)
- Affordability (+62%)
BMW M3 advantages
- Engine power (+40%)
- Pulling torque (+40%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the BMW M3 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV vs BMW M3: which should you choose?
GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV (2022 Dual Engine E+ AWD) — plug-in hybrid suv with 306 hp and 391 Nm, rated at 83.3 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $40,712 in the China market.
BMW M3 (2024 Competition xDrive) — petrol sedan with 510 hp and 650 Nm, rated at 9.9 km/L, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $108,324 in the Germany market.
GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV vs BMW M3: BMW M3 is more powerful. BMW M3 makes about 40% more power (510 vs 306 hp). GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV is the more economical, at 83.3 km/L against 9.9.
Performance
The BMW M3 is the more powerful, at 510 hp against 306 hp, with 650 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV is more economical at 83.3 km/L against 9.9 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and BMW M3 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV lists lower at about $40,712 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV better than the BMW M3?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. BMW M3 makes about 40% more power (510 vs 306 hp).
What is the main difference between the GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV and the BMW M3?
BMW M3 makes about 40% more power (510 vs 306 hp). GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV is the more economical, at 83.3 km/L against 9.9.
Which is better value?
GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GAC-Toyota Wildlander PHEV if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter. Choose the BMW M3 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.