GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Mahindra Thar
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV | Mahindra Thar | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 215 | 117 | +83.8% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 315 | 300 | +5.0% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 17.2 | 15.2 | +13.2% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 4★ (Global NCAP/BNCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Diesel | — |
| Transmission | E-CVT | Manual | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $41,972 | $13,788 | +204.4% |
- GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 84% more power (215 vs 117 hp).
- GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 15.2.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and India); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Odyssey e:HEV or Thar?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV advantages
- Engine power (+46%)
- Pulling torque (+5%)
- Fuel economy (+12%)
- Crash-test safety (+20%)
Mahindra Thar advantages
- Affordability (+67%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Mahindra Thar if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Mahindra Thar delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Mahindra Thar: which should you choose?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV (2023 Rui Zhi Edition) — petrol mpv with 215 hp and 315 Nm, rated at 17.2 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $41,972 in the China market.
Mahindra Thar (2023 2WD LX Diesel MT) — diesel suv with 117 hp and 300 Nm, rated at 15.2 km/L, 4-star Global NCAP/BNCAP safety; priced near $13,788 in the India market.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Mahindra Thar: GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is more powerful. GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 84% more power (215 vs 117 hp). GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 15.2.
Performance
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more powerful, at 215 hp against 117 hp, with 315 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a e-cvt transmission.
Running costs
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is more economical at 17.2 km/L against 15.2 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Mahindra Thar 4 stars by Global NCAP/BNCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Mahindra Thar lists lower at about $13,788 (USD-converted from the India market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV better than the Mahindra Thar?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV takes the overall edge, though Mahindra Thar wins in specific areas worth weighing. GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 84% more power (215 vs 117 hp).
What is the main difference between the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV and the Mahindra Thar?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 84% more power (215 vs 117 hp). GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 15.2.
Which is better value?
Mahindra Thar delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Mahindra Thar if you want the lower upfront cost.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.