GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs BMW i5
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV | BMW i5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 215 | 601 | -64.2% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 315 | 820 | -61.6% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Electric | — |
| Transmission | E-CVT | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $41,972 | $107,460 | -60.9% |
- BMW i5 makes about 64% more power (601 vs 215 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Odyssey e:HEV or i5?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV advantages
- Affordability (+61%)
BMW i5 advantages
- Engine power (+64%)
- Pulling torque (+62%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the BMW i5 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Value for money
BMW i5 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs BMW i5: which should you choose?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV (2023 Rui Zhi Edition) — petrol mpv with 215 hp and 315 Nm, rated at 17.2 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $41,972 in the China market.
BMW i5 (2024 M60 xDrive) — electric sedan with 601 hp and 820 Nm, rated at 18.2 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $107,460 in the Germany market.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs BMW i5: BMW i5 is more powerful. BMW i5 makes about 64% more power (601 vs 215 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The BMW i5 is the more powerful, at 601 hp against 215 hp, with 820 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Petrol vs Electric), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and BMW i5 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV lists lower at about $41,972 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV better than the BMW i5?
BMW i5 takes the overall edge, though GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV wins in specific areas worth weighing. BMW i5 makes about 64% more power (601 vs 215 hp).
What is the main difference between the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV and the BMW i5?
BMW i5 makes about 64% more power (601 vs 215 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
BMW i5 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want the lower upfront cost. Choose the BMW i5 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.