GAC Aion Aion S vs Audi e-tron
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GAC Aion Aion S | Audi e-tron | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 184 | 408 | -54.9% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 300 | 664 | -54.8% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 13.1 | 22.4 | -41.5% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Single-speed | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $22,372 | $87,372 | -74.4% |
- Audi e-tron makes about 55% more power (408 vs 184 hp).
- GAC Aion Aion S is the more efficient EV, using 13.1 kWh/100km against 22.4.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Aion S or e-tron?
GAC Aion Aion S advantages
- Energy efficiency (+42%)
- Affordability (+74%)
Audi e-tron advantages
- Engine power (+55%)
- Pulling torque (+55%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GAC Aion Aion S if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Audi e-tron if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the GAC Aion Aion S if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
GAC Aion Aion S delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GAC Aion Aion S vs Audi e-tron: which should you choose?
GAC Aion Aion S (2020 Mei 630 RWD) — electric sedan with 184 hp and 300 Nm, rated at 13.1 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $22,372 in the China market.
Audi e-tron (2020 e-tron 55 quattro) — electric suv with 408 hp and 664 Nm, rated at 22.4 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $87,372 in the Germany market.
GAC Aion Aion S vs Audi e-tron: Audi e-tron is more powerful. Audi e-tron makes about 55% more power (408 vs 184 hp). GAC Aion Aion S is the more efficient EV, using 13.1 kWh/100km against 22.4.
Performance
The Audi e-tron is the more powerful, at 408 hp against 184 hp, with 664 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The GAC Aion Aion S is the more efficient EV, drawing 13.1 kWh/100km against 22.4 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
GAC Aion Aion S is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Audi e-tron 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The GAC Aion Aion S lists lower at about $22,372 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GAC Aion Aion S better than the Audi e-tron?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Audi e-tron makes about 55% more power (408 vs 184 hp).
What is the main difference between the GAC Aion Aion S and the Audi e-tron?
Audi e-tron makes about 55% more power (408 vs 184 hp). GAC Aion Aion S is the more efficient EV, using 13.1 kWh/100km against 22.4.
Which is better value?
GAC Aion Aion S delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GAC Aion Aion S if you want the lowest charging costs per km. Choose the Audi e-tron if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.