Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Audi e-tron
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Mustang Mach-E | Audi e-tron | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 480 | 408 | +17.6% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 949 | 664 | +42.9% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 24.9 | 22.4 | +11.2% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (NHTSA) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | 1-Speed Automatic | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $60,500 | $87,372 | -30.8% |
- Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 18% more power (480 vs 408 hp).
- Audi e-tron is the more efficient EV, using 22.4 kWh/100km against 24.9.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (US and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Mustang Mach-E or e-tron?
Ford Mustang Mach-E advantages
- Engine power (+15%)
- Pulling torque (+30%)
- Affordability (+31%)
Audi e-tron advantages
- Energy efficiency (+10%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Audi e-tron if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Audi e-tron: which should you choose?
Ford Mustang Mach-E (2026 GT Extended AWD) — electric suv with 480 hp and 949 Nm, rated at 24.9 kWh/100km, 5-star NHTSA safety; priced near $60,500 in the US market.
Audi e-tron (2020 e-tron 55 quattro) — electric suv with 408 hp and 664 Nm, rated at 22.4 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $87,372 in the Germany market.
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Audi e-tron: Ford Mustang Mach-E is more powerful. Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 18% more power (480 vs 408 hp). Audi e-tron is the more efficient EV, using 22.4 kWh/100km against 24.9.
Performance
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the more powerful, at 480 hp against 408 hp, with 949 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a 1-speed automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Audi e-tron is the more efficient EV, drawing 22.4 kWh/100km against 24.9 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
Ford Mustang Mach-E is rated 5 stars by NHTSA and Audi e-tron 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Ford Mustang Mach-E lists lower at about $60,500 (USD-converted from the US market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ford Mustang Mach-E better than the Audi e-tron?
Ford Mustang Mach-E takes the overall edge, though Audi e-tron wins in specific areas worth weighing. Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 18% more power (480 vs 408 hp).
What is the main difference between the Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Audi e-tron?
Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 18% more power (480 vs 408 hp). Audi e-tron is the more efficient EV, using 22.4 kWh/100km against 24.9.
Which is better value?
Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Audi e-tron if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.