Ford Explorer vs Nissan Sakura
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Explorer | Nissan Sakura | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 400 | 64 | +525.0% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 563 | 195 | +188.7% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (NHTSA) | 5★ (JNCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Electric | — |
| Transmission | 10-Speed Automatic | Single-Speed | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $57,200 | $20,592 | +177.8% |
- Ford Explorer makes about 525% more power (400 vs 64 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (US and Japan); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Explorer or Sakura?
Ford Explorer advantages
- Engine power (+84%)
- Pulling torque (+65%)
Nissan Sakura advantages
- Affordability (+64%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Ford Explorer if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Nissan Sakura if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the Ford Explorer if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Ford Explorer delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Ford Explorer vs Nissan Sakura: which should you choose?
Ford Explorer (2026 ST AWD) — petrol suv with 400 hp and 563 Nm, rated at 8.5 km/L, 5-star NHTSA safety; priced near $57,200 in the US market.
Nissan Sakura (2026 G EV) — electric kei hatchback with 64 hp and 195 Nm, 5-star JNCAP safety; priced near $20,592 in the Japan market.
Ford Explorer vs Nissan Sakura: Ford Explorer is more powerful. Ford Explorer makes about 525% more power (400 vs 64 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Ford Explorer is the more powerful, at 400 hp against 64 hp, with 563 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 10-speed automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Petrol vs Electric), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
Ford Explorer is rated 5 stars by NHTSA and Nissan Sakura 5 stars by JNCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Nissan Sakura lists lower at about $20,592 (USD-converted from the Japan market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ford Explorer better than the Nissan Sakura?
Ford Explorer takes the overall edge, though Nissan Sakura wins in specific areas worth weighing. Ford Explorer makes about 525% more power (400 vs 64 hp).
What is the main difference between the Ford Explorer and the Nissan Sakura?
Ford Explorer makes about 525% more power (400 vs 64 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Ford Explorer delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Ford Explorer if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Nissan Sakura if you want the lower upfront cost.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.