Ford Explorer vs GAC-Honda Integra
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Explorer | GAC-Honda Integra | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 400 | 182 | +119.8% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 563 | 240 | +134.6% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 8.5 | 16.9 | -49.7% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (NHTSA) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | 10-Speed Automatic | 6-MT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $57,200 | $18,186 | +214.5% |
- Ford Explorer makes about 120% more power (400 vs 182 hp).
- GAC-Honda Integra is the more economical, at 16.9 km/L against 8.5.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (US and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Explorer or Integra?
Ford Explorer advantages
- Engine power (+55%)
- Pulling torque (+57%)
GAC-Honda Integra advantages
- Fuel economy (+50%)
- Affordability (+68%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Ford Explorer if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the GAC-Honda Integra if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the Ford Explorer if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
GAC-Honda Integra delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Ford Explorer vs GAC-Honda Integra: which should you choose?
Ford Explorer (2026 ST AWD) — petrol suv with 400 hp and 563 Nm, rated at 8.5 km/L, 5-star NHTSA safety; priced near $57,200 in the US market.
GAC-Honda Integra (2022 240TURBO MT Sport) — petrol sedan with 182 hp and 240 Nm, rated at 16.9 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $18,186 in the China market.
Ford Explorer vs GAC-Honda Integra: Ford Explorer is more powerful. Ford Explorer makes about 120% more power (400 vs 182 hp). GAC-Honda Integra is the more economical, at 16.9 km/L against 8.5.
Performance
The Ford Explorer is the more powerful, at 400 hp against 182 hp, with 563 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 10-speed automatic transmission.
Running costs
The GAC-Honda Integra is more economical at 16.9 km/L against 8.5 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
Ford Explorer is rated 5 stars by NHTSA and GAC-Honda Integra 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The GAC-Honda Integra lists lower at about $18,186 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ford Explorer better than the GAC-Honda Integra?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Ford Explorer makes about 120% more power (400 vs 182 hp).
What is the main difference between the Ford Explorer and the GAC-Honda Integra?
Ford Explorer makes about 120% more power (400 vs 182 hp). GAC-Honda Integra is the more economical, at 16.9 km/L against 8.5.
Which is better value?
GAC-Honda Integra delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Ford Explorer if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the GAC-Honda Integra if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.