Citroen Basalt vs Changan CS95
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Citroen Basalt | Changan CS95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 81 | 233 | -65.2% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 115 | 390 | -70.5% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 18.0 | 11.5 | +56.5% |
| NCAP safety | 4★ (Global NCAP/BNCAP) | 5★ (GNCAP-GCC) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | Manual | 8-Speed Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $11,988 | $36,761 | -67.4% |
- Changan CS95 makes about 65% more power (233 vs 81 hp).
- Citroen Basalt is the more economical, at 18.0 km/L against 11.5.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (India and Gulf (UAE/KSA)); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Basalt or CS95?
Citroen Basalt advantages
- Fuel economy (+36%)
- Affordability (+67%)
Changan CS95 advantages
- Engine power (+65%)
- Pulling torque (+71%)
- Crash-test safety (+20%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Citroen Basalt if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the Changan CS95 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Citroen Basalt if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
Citroen Basalt delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Citroen Basalt vs Changan CS95: which should you choose?
Citroen Basalt (2026 Plus 1.2 Petrol MT) — petrol coupe suv with 81 hp and 115 Nm, rated at 18 km/L, 4-star Global NCAP/BNCAP safety; priced near $11,988 in the India market.
Changan CS95 (2026 2.0T Platinum AWD) — petrol suv with 233 hp and 390 Nm, rated at 11.5 km/L, 5-star GNCAP-GCC safety; priced near $36,761 in the Gulf (UAE/KSA) market.
Citroen Basalt vs Changan CS95: Changan CS95 is more powerful. Changan CS95 makes about 65% more power (233 vs 81 hp). Citroen Basalt is the more economical, at 18.0 km/L against 11.5.
Performance
The Changan CS95 is the more powerful, at 233 hp against 81 hp, with 390 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 8-speed automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Citroen Basalt is more economical at 18.0 km/L against 11.5 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
Citroen Basalt is rated 4 stars by Global NCAP/BNCAP and Changan CS95 5 stars by GNCAP-GCC. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Citroen Basalt lists lower at about $11,988 (USD-converted from the India market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Citroen Basalt better than the Changan CS95?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Changan CS95 makes about 65% more power (233 vs 81 hp).
What is the main difference between the Citroen Basalt and the Changan CS95?
Changan CS95 makes about 65% more power (233 vs 81 hp). Citroen Basalt is the more economical, at 18.0 km/L against 11.5.
Which is better value?
Citroen Basalt delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Citroen Basalt if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter. Choose the Changan CS95 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.