Chery Omoda 5 vs Audi RS e-tron GT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Chery Omoda 5 | Audi RS e-tron GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 156 | 646 | -75.9% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 230 | 830 | -72.3% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (ASEAN NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Electric | — |
| Transmission | CVT | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $24,948 | $153,900 | -83.8% |
- Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 76% more power (646 vs 156 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Malaysia and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Omoda 5 or RS e-tron GT?
Chery Omoda 5 advantages
- Affordability (+84%)
Audi RS e-tron GT advantages
- Engine power (+76%)
- Pulling torque (+72%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Chery Omoda 5 if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Value for money
Chery Omoda 5 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Chery Omoda 5 vs Audi RS e-tron GT: which should you choose?
Chery Omoda 5 (2023 H Variant) — petrol suv with 156 hp and 230 Nm, rated at 14.5 km/L, 5-star ASEAN NCAP safety; priced near $24,948 in the Malaysia market.
Audi RS e-tron GT (2024 RS e-tron GT quattro) — electric sedan with 646 hp and 830 Nm, rated at 20.2 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $153,900 in the Germany market.
Chery Omoda 5 vs Audi RS e-tron GT: Audi RS e-tron GT is more powerful. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 76% more power (646 vs 156 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Audi RS e-tron GT is the more powerful, at 646 hp against 156 hp, with 830 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Petrol vs Electric), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
Chery Omoda 5 is rated 5 stars by ASEAN NCAP and Audi RS e-tron GT 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Chery Omoda 5 lists lower at about $24,948 (USD-converted from the Malaysia market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Chery Omoda 5 better than the Audi RS e-tron GT?
Audi RS e-tron GT takes the overall edge, though Chery Omoda 5 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 76% more power (646 vs 156 hp).
What is the main difference between the Chery Omoda 5 and the Audi RS e-tron GT?
Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 76% more power (646 vs 156 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Chery Omoda 5 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Chery Omoda 5 if you want the lower upfront cost. Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.