Changan Qiyuan A07 EV vs Xiaomi MX11 SUV
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Changan Qiyuan A07 EV | Xiaomi MX11 SUV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 258 | 673 | -61.7% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 320 | 838 | -61.8% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 12.3 | 14.5 | -15.2% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Single-speed | Single-speed | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $24,766 | $48,986 | -49.4% |
- Xiaomi MX11 SUV makes about 62% more power (673 vs 258 hp).
- Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 14.5.
Verdict: Qiyuan A07 EV or MX11 SUV?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV advantages
- Energy efficiency (+15%)
- Affordability (+49%)
Xiaomi MX11 SUV advantages
- Engine power (+62%)
- Pulling torque (+62%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Xiaomi MX11 SUV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
Xiaomi MX11 SUV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV vs Xiaomi MX11 SUV: which should you choose?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV (2023 515 Pro Edition) — electric sedan with 258 hp and 320 Nm, rated at 12.3 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $24,766 in the China market.
Xiaomi MX11 SUV (2026 Production Edition AWD Ultra) — electric suv with 673 hp and 838 Nm, rated at 14.5 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $48,986 in the China market.
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV vs Xiaomi MX11 SUV: Xiaomi MX11 SUV is more powerful. Xiaomi MX11 SUV makes about 62% more power (673 vs 258 hp). Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 14.5.
Performance
The Xiaomi MX11 SUV is the more powerful, at 673 hp against 258 hp, with 838 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a single-speed transmission.
Running costs
The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, drawing 12.3 kWh/100km against 14.5 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Xiaomi MX11 SUV 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV lists lower at about $24,766 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV better than the Xiaomi MX11 SUV?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Xiaomi MX11 SUV makes about 62% more power (673 vs 258 hp).
What is the main difference between the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV and the Xiaomi MX11 SUV?
Xiaomi MX11 SUV makes about 62% more power (673 vs 258 hp). Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.3 kWh/100km against 14.5.
Which is better value?
Xiaomi MX11 SUV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want the lowest charging costs per km. Choose the Xiaomi MX11 SUV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.