Changan Qiyuan A07 EV vs Wuling Bingo
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Changan Qiyuan A07 EV | Wuling Bingo | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 258 | 41 | +529.3% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 320 | 110 | +190.9% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 12.3 | 9.5 | +29.5% |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Single-speed | Single-speed | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $24,766 | $8,372 | +195.8% |
- Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 529% more power (258 vs 41 hp).
- Wuling Bingo is the more efficient EV, using 9.5 kWh/100km against 12.3.
Verdict: Qiyuan A07 EV or Bingo?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV advantages
- Engine power (+84%)
- Pulling torque (+66%)
Wuling Bingo advantages
- Energy efficiency (+23%)
- Affordability (+66%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Wuling Bingo if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV vs Wuling Bingo: which should you choose?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV (2023 515 Pro Edition) — electric sedan with 258 hp and 320 Nm, rated at 12.3 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $24,766 in the China market.
Wuling Bingo (2022 Standard Range 203KM) — electric hatchback with 41 hp and 110 Nm, rated at 9.5 kWh/100km; priced near $8,372 in the China market.
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV vs Wuling Bingo: Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is more powerful. Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 529% more power (258 vs 41 hp). Wuling Bingo is the more efficient EV, using 9.5 kWh/100km against 12.3.
Performance
The Changan Qiyuan A07 EV is the more powerful, at 258 hp against 41 hp, with 320 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a single-speed transmission.
Running costs
The Wuling Bingo is the more efficient EV, drawing 9.5 kWh/100km against 12.3 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Price and value
The Wuling Bingo lists lower at about $8,372 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV better than the Wuling Bingo?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 529% more power (258 vs 41 hp).
What is the main difference between the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV and the Wuling Bingo?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV makes about 529% more power (258 vs 41 hp). Wuling Bingo is the more efficient EV, using 9.5 kWh/100km against 12.3.
Which is better value?
Changan Qiyuan A07 EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Changan Qiyuan A07 EV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Wuling Bingo if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.