Changan CS95 vs Renault Clio
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Changan CS95 | Renault Clio | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 233 | 145 | +60.7% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 390 | 205 | +90.2% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 11.5 | 23.8 | -51.7% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (GNCAP-GCC) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Hybrid | — |
| Transmission | 8-Speed Automatic | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $36,761 | $33,588 | +9.4% |
- Changan CS95 makes about 61% more power (233 vs 145 hp).
- Renault Clio is the more economical, at 23.8 km/L against 11.5.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Gulf (UAE/KSA) and EU); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: CS95 or Clio?
Changan CS95 advantages
- Engine power (+38%)
- Pulling torque (+47%)
Renault Clio advantages
- Fuel economy (+52%)
- Affordability (+9%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Changan CS95 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Renault Clio if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the Changan CS95 if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Changan CS95 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Changan CS95 vs Renault Clio: which should you choose?
Changan CS95 (2026 2.0T Platinum AWD) — petrol suv with 233 hp and 390 Nm, rated at 11.5 km/L, 5-star GNCAP-GCC safety; priced near $36,761 in the Gulf (UAE/KSA) market.
Renault Clio (2026 E-Tech Hybrid 145 Esprit Alpine) — hybrid hatchback with 145 hp and 205 Nm, rated at 23.8 km/L, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $33,588 in the EU market.
Changan CS95 vs Renault Clio: Changan CS95 is more powerful. Changan CS95 makes about 61% more power (233 vs 145 hp). Renault Clio is the more economical, at 23.8 km/L against 11.5.
Performance
The Changan CS95 is the more powerful, at 233 hp against 145 hp, with 390 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 8-speed automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Renault Clio is more economical at 23.8 km/L against 11.5 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
Changan CS95 is rated 5 stars by GNCAP-GCC and Renault Clio 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Renault Clio lists lower at about $33,588 (USD-converted from the EU market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Changan CS95 better than the Renault Clio?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Changan CS95 makes about 61% more power (233 vs 145 hp).
What is the main difference between the Changan CS95 and the Renault Clio?
Changan CS95 makes about 61% more power (233 vs 145 hp). Renault Clio is the more economical, at 23.8 km/L against 11.5.
Which is better value?
Changan CS95 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Changan CS95 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Renault Clio if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.