BYD Qin Plus EV vs Audi RS e-tron GT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | BYD Qin Plus EV | Audi RS e-tron GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 184 | 646 | -71.5% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 280 | 830 | -66.3% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 12.5 | 20.2 | -38.1% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Single-speed | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $23,352 | $153,900 | -84.8% |
- Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 72% more power (646 vs 184 hp).
- BYD Qin Plus EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.5 kWh/100km against 20.2.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Qin Plus EV or RS e-tron GT?
BYD Qin Plus EV advantages
- Energy efficiency (+38%)
- Affordability (+85%)
Audi RS e-tron GT advantages
- Engine power (+72%)
- Pulling torque (+66%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the BYD Qin Plus EV if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the BYD Qin Plus EV if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
BYD Qin Plus EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
BYD Qin Plus EV vs Audi RS e-tron GT: which should you choose?
BYD Qin Plus EV (2021 600KM Flagship) — electric sedan with 184 hp and 280 Nm, rated at 12.5 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $23,352 in the China market.
Audi RS e-tron GT (2024 RS e-tron GT quattro) — electric sedan with 646 hp and 830 Nm, rated at 20.2 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $153,900 in the Germany market.
BYD Qin Plus EV vs Audi RS e-tron GT: Audi RS e-tron GT is more powerful. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 72% more power (646 vs 184 hp). BYD Qin Plus EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.5 kWh/100km against 20.2.
Performance
The Audi RS e-tron GT is the more powerful, at 646 hp against 184 hp, with 830 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The BYD Qin Plus EV is the more efficient EV, drawing 12.5 kWh/100km against 20.2 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
BYD Qin Plus EV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Audi RS e-tron GT 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The BYD Qin Plus EV lists lower at about $23,352 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the BYD Qin Plus EV better than the Audi RS e-tron GT?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 72% more power (646 vs 184 hp).
What is the main difference between the BYD Qin Plus EV and the Audi RS e-tron GT?
Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 72% more power (646 vs 184 hp). BYD Qin Plus EV is the more efficient EV, using 12.5 kWh/100km against 20.2.
Which is better value?
BYD Qin Plus EV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the BYD Qin Plus EV if you want the lowest charging costs per km. Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.